this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
2373 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59311 readers
4864 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
2373
Google decimates Twitter search results after Elon Musk imposes limits on reading tweets (www.rawstory.com)
submitted 1 year ago by DevCat@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
441 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Google has reportedly removed much of Twitter's links from its search results after the social network's owner Elon Musk announced reading tweets would be limited.

Search Engine Roundtable found that Google had removed 52% of Twitter links since the crackdown began last week. Twitter now blocks users who are not logged in and sets limits on reading tweets.

According to Barry Schwartz, Google reported 471 million Twitter URLs as of Friday. But by Monday morning, that number had plummeted to 227 million.

"For normal indexing of these Twitter URLs, it seems like these tweets are dropping out of the sky," Schwartz wrote.

Platformer reported last month that Twitter refused to pay its bill for Google Cloud services.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ShustOne@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He can't write off 44 billion though, he would get a tiny fraction of that and there are debts to pay back to investors.

[–] fluke@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think he's interested ingetting it back, just to no longer be on the hook for it. I'm sure there's no doubt various loopholes that he can use to wiggle out of the full consequences of his stupidity and hubris.

[–] ShustOne@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So when you do a write off you still are responsible for that money. It's not declaring bankruptcy, it's just lowering your taxable income due to loss. So "write-off" doesn't really make much sense in this context.

[–] fluke@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe not the correct 'legal' term. But it's splitting hairs really.

He wants rid of his serious burden. And imagine he thinks that he can do that if he kills the platform. Instead of being on the hook for 44billion with the repayments and interest attributed to that every month, he can cut that down to a fraction.

I'm not saying I have any idea how it works, or even if it's possible. Mainly that I wouldn't be surprised if it was.