this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
534 points (98.0% liked)

News

23284 readers
5504 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm a politics junkie, don't throw me in with the general public. I watched the entire thing. I'll watch commentary and listen to podcasts about politics at least two hours a day, every day.

But what he's done is not the point. I'm talking about his chances in November and they are not hopeful.

The debate was a disaster not because he fumbled his words a bit. It is because for years Trump has been calling Biden this weak old senile man, Sleepy Joe, etcetera, and everyone on the Democratic side was able to pass it off as Trump exaggeration and trolling.

But in the debate, suddenly there was no denying it. Biden is losing it. Now those Trump jabs actually hurt because we know there's a truth to it. The whole world watched as Biden was asked a question on abortion (which should be central in his campaign, a sure winner after Roe v Wade was killed) and shot himself in the foot turning it into a story about illegal immigrants coming in and raping young women.

How do you fuck up like that. And how do you recover. I don't want Biden to give it his best shot, I want him to halt this slide into fascism and he's failing at it

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

"what he's done is not the point"

Yes, it is the point. The very fact you don't understand that is the problem

Biden is an old man and fumbled his words, it has no bearing on the legislation he's produced during his first term at a rapid pace for progressive policies.

His consistently progressive presidential policies and tangible results are what matters

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If he loses November he can't deliver any of those tangible results. Of course policy matters, but getting elected is important too.

Elections are won on getting people to turn up and vote for you, simple as. If independents stay home because they can't bring themselves to vote for an 81 year old showing signs of dementia, he's gonna lose.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Independents are independents because they care about the issues, they're not going to be as confused as many are by discerning YouTube clips vs. active achieved Biden legislation.

Biden has consistently proved himself by achieving legislation Americans care about.

What you're talking about are party voters who watch 5 second clips on YouTube and believe conglomerate groupthink headlines.

By and large, they are going to vote for the party they've adhered to.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Stop telling other voters what they should consider important. There are many people out there who will base their vote on what they see in the news, whether you like it or not. It sucks that Trump gets a pass from his base for things that Biden's base won't accept from him. It sucks that Biden is not as charismatic (anymore, if you thought him charismatic before) as Trump is to his base. It sucks that millions and millions of voters don't know shit about policy and base their vote off of 5 second clips on repeat at Fox News. It sucks that both candidates are record settingly old, but only Biden gets flak for it.

But that's how it is. You can't tell people who to vote for or what's important.

Welcome to politics, bud.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"Stop telling other voters what they should consider important"

You're trying to tell people right now that what's important in a president is image instead of achieved and stated policy.

That is incorrect.

Throw all the tantrums you want, but people are going to vote how they want to vote, not how you personally want them to vote.

Let them make that decision on substance rather than confetti.

Biden has achieved great results for civil rights, critical infrastructure, green, sustainable technology, climate change in general, student debt, immigration, and the list goes on.

If you personally want to focus on YouTube clips, that's your jam.

But everyone who is still making up their mind should be looking at policy, because that's what matters when you elect a president.

Voters should be basing their votes on the best candidates to achieve their desired legislative policies.

If you are left-leaning, Biden has achieved a laudable, astonishing amount of progressive legislation in his first term.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I'm literally not. I'm describing to you that voters can be like that, and you keep repeating those voters are wrong and they "should" base their vote on policy instead. I'm not "personally focused" on YouTube clips, just telling you many voters can't ignore those public appearances where Biden comes off as incredibly old - which he is! - and that the debate was such a disaster because it made it impossible to shrug off Trump's main attack line against Biden any longer. Keep telling voters they're wrong voting the way they do and you're setting yourself up for disappointment. And setting the country on the road to fascism again.

If Trump wins, I'm blaming the Democratic Party establishment for their complacency, their gerontocracy, wasting the youth vote potential by supporting Israeli atrocities, and not following through on increasing the minimum wage if you want to focus on policy. Policy isn't everything. We all know most of Biden's policies are popular, but if they can't convert that into votes, they're still going to lose. This time, they can't say they didn't see it coming.

I'm kinda done now, it's like talking to a brick wall. Biden is polling terribly and blaming voters they should look at policy and overlook Biden's mental decline isn't going to change that.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

If trump wins, you should be looking in the mirror for trying to convince people that fanfare and imagery is what they should be voting on rather than a good president.

One old guy, whose age has not stopped him achieving landmark progressive legislation for 4 years straight as president, being about 3 years older than the other old guy, is an impractical and irrelevant concern to the administration of the presidency and to this election.

You are arguing that we should focus on YouTube clips and public displays instead of policy and achievement.

You're blaming other voters for your anxieties. Those are your issues.

Your irrelevant name calling and ignoring the actual candidacy in favor of irrelevant headlines is what's helping your maga friends, not a good President determined to be reelected who's been working fine for 4 years.

You can write biden a letter asking him to practice his somersaults, but that is as irrelevant to him continuing to be a good president as your other complaints.

This is an election. It doesn't matter how much you stamp your feet about your own anxieties, people get to vote for who they want to vote for and whoever you want will win or lose according to the results.

Let the voters decide who they want to vote for based on substance, not your confetti.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not going to change my valid points because you're parroting irrelevant groupthink

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You have yet to make any valid points

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Try reading the thread first and addressing specifics instead of babbling nonsense

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I read the thread, there's nothing to address because the other guy already has, and he's right about you being like a brick wall

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yes, I reply logically and consistently to a meandering mess of invective.

You want to change someone's mind?

Make a valid point related to the topic.