this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

Sysadmin

7666 readers
5 users here now

A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration

No generic Lemmy issue posts please! Posts about Lemmy belong in one of these communities:
!lemmy@lemmy.ml
!lemmyworld@lemmy.world
!lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
!support@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
DarraignTheSane@lemmy.world
00Lemming@lemmy.world
L3s@lemmy.world
17
Does nonstop reading from a hard drive reduce its lifespan? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by Kalcifer@lemmy.world to c/sysadmin@lemmy.world
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I was thinking of setting up a seedbox. Seeding will mean that the hard drive is being read from virtually non-stop. Is it fair to say that hard drives are designed for this? Or would this reduce the operational life-span of the hard drive?

For example, I was trying to find some spec in the Seagate Barracuda hard drive specifications document, but I wasn't able to find anything specific to this (or perhaps I just missed it).

I'm not exactly sure if this is the right community to post this, so let me know if there's a better place for it to go.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kalcifer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don’t know, but ideally that data would be cached in RAM.

Not feesible, unfortunately, if we are talking about multiple terabytes of data.

Maybe if you used intelligent tiered storage with a flash tier it could reduce wear and access times.

Could you clarify what you mean?

A surveillance camera PVR is writing 24/7 which is more intense, and those drives still last plenty long.

That's a fair point; however, I have seen special hard drives exactly for this purpose.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

I would go with ZFS via Truenas. It makes the setup pretty simple and it will have all the benefits of zfs

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Torrents are never equally in demand. A large amount of ram could maybe cache the majority of reads, even to a multi-TB array.