Firefox

17898 readers

85 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

"Privacy-Preserving" Attribution: Mozilla Disappoints Us Yet Again (blog.privacyguides.org)

submitted 4 months ago by moreeni@lemm.ee to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

All of the Firefox forks are Firefox with a user.js added to it. So just use Firefox with a user.js. Here's three user.js'.

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As someone who uses ff with a user script I can totally see why someone would want the convenience of this built in out of the box. We can have both. And a person can use both.

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works -4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The biggest problem I have is they don't link their user.js. So you can see what they're doing.

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 months ago

Wdym? It's open source.

You know user.js is just Firefox about:config flags built into Firefox from the tor upscale project...you can literally just do about:config and read the setup. Or read the source.

Heres the repo: https://codeberg.org/librewolf/settings

Heres their default flags https://codeberg.org/librewolf/settings/src/branch/master/librewolf.cfg