this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
913 points (98.8% liked)

Uplifting News

11294 readers
199 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's because the drink manufacturers mostly just stopped selling the full sugar versions

Which was a result of the sugar tax. They didn't just suddenly drop the sugar content for no reason.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The sugar tax didn't include artificial sweeteners? That's an oversight. Those things are bad for you in ways that are different from digestable sugars.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

They're nowhere near as bad as consuming a huge amount of sugar.

They only cause issues for a vanishingly tiny amount of people that have pre-existing genetic conditions.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's highly debatable. It's swapping one set of side effects for another, especially when drunk at high volumes.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's not highly debatable, it's been studied to death. Sweeteners have existed for a long time.

There were rumours they cause cancer, this has been proven false. There were rumours they cause headaches, this has been proven false. There were rumours they cause infertility, this has been proven false. There have been rumours they stimulate your appetite, this likewise has zero scientific backing.

Aspartame, the most common sweetener, does cause issues for people with phenylketonuria, a rare genetic disorder, because it contains stuff they can't metabolise. But so does a long list of foods people eat every day.

Some polyol sweeteners have a mild laxative effect if consumed in very high quantities, but the same is true for stuff like tea, coffee, most fruits, etc.

Sugar is far worse for your health.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Artificial sweeteners were created to fight glycation and allow people with diabetes enjoy sweetness.

And glycation is bad thing.