this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
8 points (52.9% liked)

politics

19097 readers
3230 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

That’s weird. I thought they said it was because he had a cold.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’ll assume that you’re resorting to ad hominem attacks because you’re unable to attack the substance of what I say.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works -5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wasnt even thinking about ad hominems, I was stating that you being the same person is irrelevant when it comes to credibility. If I was gonna go to ad hominems youd damned well know.

Im an asshole, but I legit dont care enough about you or your opinions to waste mine time on ya beyond this point. I attacking your dumb idea that just cause you may or may not be the same person that ran that reddit account. I was attacking the idea that you migrating gives ya any credibility of not being bad faith, a troll, or anything else good or bad.

I aint gonna continue responding past this point for anything other than calling you a profligate, because frabkly speaking ya aibt interesting enough for me to waste my time with ya. Youre anti-Biden schtick is a dime a dozen here on Lemmy and frankly speaking I skip over it 90% of the time cause it breaks down to a difference of opinions. Im done now have a good day, night, or something in between.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I agree with the premise that OP may have an agenda. But let's be real - you pointing that out is an ad hominem attack.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Eh whatever, couldnt really care too much less at this point.