this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
-8 points (10.0% liked)

politics

19102 readers
4178 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

All undecided voters in a U.S. swing states focus group hosted by pollster Frank Luntz said President Biden should be replaced as the Democratic nominee after watching his first presidential debate against former President Trump.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Nate Silver and the NYT editorial board have both called for Biden to step down.

By every metric Biden is performing significantly-worse compared to his 2020 run against Trump. Biden needs to step down now while we have time.

This gives a huge opportunity for Democrats to take back the narrative and inject some excitement into nominating a fresh, younger, face. Free viral media attention would go on every day until the election and Democrats can turn around and say, "we listened to the electorate's concerns on age, are responding." Meanwhile the Republican propaganda machine wouldn't have prepared talking-points lined up.

Finally, look, I voted for Biden and I'd vote for a corpse if it came down to it, but it's not me you have to convince. We elected Biden because he said he'd take the fight to the bully. He's not the Teddy Roosevelt fighter we need to push a bully back. He's not convincing ANY battleground state swing-voters with a performance like that which will resonate over any subsequent teleprompter speeches he may give thereafter.

Edit: Hey folks, if you have the energy to down-vote, would you mind mustering a bit more to actually put your convictions to the test and discuss with me? I can otherwise only conclude you've got no substantive rebuttal and this is denial acting out. I'd appreciate it. Thank you.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That'll never happen. But I think you're right. The instant goodwill would be enormous.

Have they even bothered with the next "rising star" at all?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Have they even bothered with the next “rising star” at all?

They haven't found one. It's like no one gets into politics to change nothing anymore.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

True. I wouldn't be a politician if you begged me. I've worked for one before. It's a nightmare.

It's also a huge problem, since most people won't do it either.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think you misunderstand me. Let me clarify.

Democrats haven't found someone who they want to be their next standard bearer because no one gets into politics because they want to change nothing anymore.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do you mean because they don't want to change anything anymore?

Your wording is very strange, sorry.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean the party only wants people who don't want to change anything at all except for the worse, just like their Republican buddies, yes.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well, I commend you on learning English as a second language. But your statement is shortsighted.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My statement is based on decades of watching Democrats not change shit and capitulating to Republicans.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Right right. I too like to ignore bills that have been passed and who passed them 🙄

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You sure like to ignore bills that Democrats joined Republicans in blocking.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Holy shit, you can speak English!

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago

Oh boy, you really "got me on that one".

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Man I've never seen media like this. I've watched:

  • 2 different NYT podcasts
  • Jon Stewart's comments
  • Kari Couric's discussion.
  • NPR's post-debate
  • Washington Week's round-table, led by The Atlantic editor-in-chief
  • Pod Save America (former Obama/Biden staffers)
  • Silver's analysis.

... And the sentiment behind Biden stepping down is vast. Talk behind closed-doors is that US House Democrats are extremely worried about their races given downballot effect.

I think it must be done or I'd absolutely bet on Trump winning in November, sadly.

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And sadly, the campaign response to this sentiment is not inspiring a lot of faith in their judgment. This after the NYT Editorial Board called on him to step aside:

“The last time Joe Biden lost the New York Times editorial board’s endorsement it turned out pretty well for him,” Biden campaign co-chair Cedric L. Richmond said in a statement.

Does he think that "LOL! Fuck you!" is the correct response here? The chorus of people in every corner of the country calling for him to step aside is deafening, and all he can muster is a Trump-style clapback?

Furthermore, at this point I'm having a hard time envisioning a scenario where asking the incumbent to drop out would be more justified. Like, how bad would it actually have to get for the party to admit, "hey guys, this isn't fixable, time for Plan B"? Incumbency advantage is huge, but it's certainly not all-powerful.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah agrees that is pure hubris and completely unfounded confidence, downplaying what is at stake in this election. We're fucked.

[–] PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee -1 points 4 months ago

I'm usually wrong about important things, so I'm going to stick with it'll never happen lol