politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Not true at all, just watch the interview he did last night...https://hannity.com/media-room/theyre-wrong-trump-shuts-down-critics-who-say-hed-seek-retribution-if-elected-it-has-to-stop-watch/
Oh so he said a different thing one time and that's the absolute truth? Lol
He's been saying that, the fake news just like to cherry pick everything he says. Sadly, a lot of people just aren't very bright and they buy into it just like when they rambled on about the Hunter Biden laptop telling people it was Russian disinformation. It's just government propaganda
Oh you mean the laptop that had no chain of custody, and let's say it's all true, literally nothing illegal?
Plenty of evidence of illegal activities on the laptop, drugs, prostitution, text and emails implementing him and others in more crimes. They just want you to believe there was nothing but d*ck pics on it
0 chain of custody. 0 proof of truth of evidence, or he'd be in court, like he literally is now.
Lol, what do you think it is that got him into court? If ut wasn't for the text messages on his laptop and him writing a book about it, he would have never been in court in the first place because they wouldn't have known he lied on the form
Guilty on all 34 counts you little girl
Jaja hannity 🤡
Wow, how old are you, like 10?
Ja ja did you just get back from your ban ja ja 😂
Yeah, par for the course for Hannity and anything fox news related, misleading headline and quote, from a misleading non-answer by Trump that's so all over the place it's hard to follow. Even the tiny little portion they clipped out, he goes on to say he has "every right" to go after Biden if elected.
And his accusations that Biden is directing his prosecution (especially ridiculous when two of the cases are state cases) are all projection anyways to distract from the fact that he's already tried to interfere at the justice department many times when he was president.
"Trump ratchets up call for DOJ to investigate Hillary Clinton" https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/03/trump-doj-investigate-hillary-clinton-244505
"Trump ups pressure on Barr to probe Bidens as election nears" https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-william-barr-elections-20fd56b64801dd83b1657c630a1ebdfa
"Trump breaches boundaries by saying DOJ should be ‘going after’ Democrats" https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-breaches-boundaries-by-saying-doj-should-be-going-after-democrats/2017/11/03/1c157c08-c0aa-11e7-97d9-bdab5a0ab381_story.html
"‘Where are all of the arrests?’: Trump demands Barr lock up his foes" https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/07/trump-demands-barr-arrest-foes-427389
"Report: Trump wanted to prosecute Comey, Hillary Clinton" https://apnews.com/article/060ca2399a744b4a9554dbd2ec276a90
Such a short memory Trump has. So yes, it is very true, and he's already tried to do it many times. I know you're probably a troll posting misinformation, this comment is for anyone else reading.
All the news sources you mention are the same ones that said the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation
Geeze dude, half of the shit in there is out of Trump's own mouth. The first quote I listed was from the interview you posted! From Sean Hannity! If you're not just a troll, you really need to take a step back and at least listen to some of the things your own god king is saying.
And yeah I'll be sure not to vote for Hunter Biden or his laptop for president, thanks.
Trump said he's not going to weaponize the justice department to go after his political enemies because what's going on now has to stop even though he would have every right to do so. I do listen to what says, including the context which is something a lot of people like to leave out I noticed
Got Damn son, you didn't just have a glass of the fucking Kool Aid, you drank the entire pitcher and asked for more.
Exactly what someone drinking all the kool-aid would say
Because it was. J
If it was, it wouldn't have been entered into evidence in the trial