I really don't know whats going about the Anti-AI people. But is getting pretty similar to any other negationism, anti-science, anti-progress... Completely irrational and radicalized.

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry to hurt your fefes, but I don't like theft and that is what AI content ALL is. How does it "know" how to program? Code stolen form humans. How does it speak? Words stolen from humans. How does it draw? Art stolen from humans.

Until this shit stops being built on a mountain of stolen data and stolen livelihoods, the argument is over. I don't care if you like stealing money from artists so that you can pretend you had any creative input into an AIs art output. You're stealing the work of normal people and think it's okay because it was already stolen once before by the billionaires who are now selling it to you.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Intelectual property is a capitalist invention.

Human culture is to be shared.

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh right, we live under communism, where everyone's needs are cared for. My bad

Oh wait, we aren't and you are just a shithead who, once again, wants to tell me that stealing from other workers is good.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

How can something being stolen if no one took anything from you.

Same as piracy is not stealing. Training AI models is not stealing. Sharing is caring.

If you don't get paid enough go ask your boss why he makes much more money than you.

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, please apply the logic of stealing form large multi-national corporations to individual artists. Sterling logic.

I know why my boss makes more money then me. Because he is my enemy in a class war.

If any of these AI models draws art that is slightly too close to looking like Mickey Mouse the Disney corporation is sharpening the lawyer axe. I wonder why. But sharing is caring, right? Why would they do that?

Oh right because they want to decide what their intellectual property is used for. A right that wasn't afforded to basically every single artist whose stuff was used to train these models. These artists often rely directly on selling their art for their daily survival. Maybe they would have liked some money to sell their art for this purpose? Maybe they didn't want to sell it at all? Doesn't matter, they weren't asked. If you don't have an army of lawyers, the corporations will do as they like. Which is why Disney is save, while normal artists are fucked and weren't even asked in what hole they would like it before they were.

So shut the fuck up about sharing is caring, it's easy to say that if you are the one taking advantage. I don't know what field you work in, but I hope you lose your job to a robot that they trained on recordings of your work. You can tell me then how good it feels to share your skills.