this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
212 points (95.7% liked)

Linux

47557 readers
862 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I study math at uni and I was shocked realizing all my teachers use ubuntu on both their laptop and work desktop

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 months ago (12 children)

it's kinda the fire-and-forget of OSes. you just press the update/upgrade button when the unattended-upgrade didn't catch all and it just works for free and forever.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 3 points 3 months ago (11 children)

So it has auto updates enabled? Windows, macOS and a ton of other Linux distros do that as well.

I think it's moreso that Ubuntu is (one of the) most used desktop Linux OSes, so a lot of corporations and individuals who like to play safe just go with that

[–] biscuitswalrus@aussie.zone 5 points 3 months ago (6 children)

From my perspective, if used for work, automatic security updates should be mandatory. Linux is damn impressive with live patch. With thousands or even tens of thousands of endpoints, it's negligent to not patch.

Features? Don't care. But security updates are essential in a large organisation.

The worst part of the Linux fan base is the users who hate forced updates, and also don't believe in AV. Ok on your home network that's not very risky compared to a corp network with a million student and staff personal information often with byo devices only a network segment away and APT groups targeting you because they know your reputation is worth something to ransom.

[–] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

if used for work...Features? Don't care.

Most organizations care about maintaining document compatibility, especially formatting, and that usually means Office365. Microsoft is notorious for publishing a standard and then ignoring their own standard, making it exceedingly difficult to use other office suites.

I've heard OnlyOffice does the best at maintaining compatibility.

[–] biscuitswalrus@aussie.zone 1 points 3 months ago

Sorry to clarify: updates come as security or as feature updates. If I've already got a standard operating environment (SOE) with all the features I/staff need to do work, I don't need new features.

I then have to watch cves with my cve trackers to know when software updates are needed and all devices with those software get updated and the SOE is updated.

I can go on a rant about how bad the Linux has recently made my life as someone's policy is that any Linux bug might be a security vulnerability and therefore I now have infinite noise in my cve feed, which in turn is making decisions on how to mitigate security issues hard, but that is beyond this discussion.

So in short I'm only talking about when you update, updating only security fixes, not the software and features. Live patching security vulnerabilities is pretty much free low effort, low impact, and in my personal opinion, absolutely critical. But software features patching can be disruptive, leaves little to be gained, and really only should be driven for a request to need that feature at which point it would also include an update to the SOE.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)