this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
77 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10111 readers
130 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This sucks. This is leaning further into the Major Questions Doctrine that SCOTUS has been pushing, where agencies and their actually knowledgeable, employed scientists and technical experts, have no real control over regulatory policies, and instead are beholden to Congress and judges to decide e.g. how many ppm of a chemical is safe for people to drink.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Thats a good thing. Unelected officials should not be passing laws.

[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Regulations are not laws. They are the specific implementation mechanisms of laws.

For example, Congress passes a law like the Clean Water Act. But that law doesn't (and cannot feasibily) lay out every single individual rule necessary to ensure the clean water that it seeks to protect and provide.

For example, it contains a section that requires Water Quality Standards to be set by each state, for themselves. However, if a state does not create them, the act authorizes the EPA to create a standard for them.

That's not the EPA "creating laws", it's the EPA implementing the congressionally-passed CWA.

[–] Soundhole@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago

It is extremely kind of you to take the time to explain since our media can't seem to be bothered to.

load more comments (8 replies)