> Greentext

7541 readers

505 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

230

Anon discovers .NET (programming.dev)

submitted 5 months ago by starman@programming.dev to c/greentext@lemmy.ml

83 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You can also easily write your own option monad or use a tiny library that does.

[–] anus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Good idea, then patch the whole standard library and dotmet framework and most popular libraries to use that tiny library

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You don't need to use the same one. Just don't expose it publicly in libraries.

[–] anus@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is the stupidest thing I've read all day

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 0 points 5 months ago

Didn't ask

[–] AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 5 months ago

Yeah, 100%. I don't really recognize the complaint that "it isn't in the standard library" as being super valid. If you know what an option monad is and you want to use one, you can certainly create one. Lots of people don't know what it is and won't miss it, especially in this context since the option monad is a functional construct and C# is an objects-first language.