this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
122 points (96.2% liked)

Games

32518 readers
1550 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Colin Moriarty says he has seen proof of its authenticity and thinks it could be announced in August; several clues in recent days point to its existence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cityslicker343@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How about a RDR2 remaster for ps5

[–] sarge@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd honestly pay for a 60fps patch.

[–] DrummyB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Unpopular opinion I’m sure, but RDR2 actually looks worse in 60fps.

It was literally designed to look cinematic -like a film- hence the lower frame rate and things like film grain being added, etc. It specifically notes in the settings that this was the artistic intent of the developers.

Not saying people couldn’t play it in 60fps if they felt like it, but every high-frame-rate mod I’ve seen of the game, it actually looks LESS realistic. And that was sort of the intention - realism.

[–] drzoidberg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Nah, you can fuck all the way off.

-Rockstar, probably

[–] EeeDawg101@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

They should release the red dead 1 remake and if you buy it you get a free upgrade for red dead 2 60fps “remastered”.