this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
-24 points (21.4% liked)

Programming

17453 readers
70 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz
-24
Mojo vs Julia (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 5 months ago by wargreymon@sh.itjust.works to c/programming@programming.dev
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Discuss.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Haven't tried Mojo yet but I have tried Julia and it kinda sucked balls. Sorry Julia fans, but it did. My main complaints:

  • It's a research language like MATLAB, so the emphasis is on repl's, trying things out etc. But the compilation model is like C++. When you import a package it spends like 2 minutes compiling it. I think it's supposed to cache it but the second time it was still like 10 seconds for me just to import a package. I believe they've improved this since I used it but still, huge red flag.
  • 1-based indexing. Come on guys. Anyone using this is smart enough to learn 0-based indexing. It's like putting a steering wheel in a jet fighter because you worry about pilots getting confused by a joystick. Again, red flag.
  • The plotting libraries (a core feature for this sort of language) kind of sucks. In fairness nothing comes close to MATLAB on this front. I ended up paying for MATLAB because of that.

There's also this article which has more reasons.

I am leaving it a while longer before I try Mojo.

[–] wargreymon@sh.itjust.works -4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Your arguments and article are interesting, but...

1-based indexing. Come on guys. Anyone using this is smart enough to learn 0-based indexing.

Julia is high-level language. 1 is the one thing, 0 is nothing.

steering wheel in a jet fighter

The steering wheel is 0-based indexing.

[–] Giooschi@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

High or low level doesn't matter. Mathematically it just makes more sense to use 0-based indexing https://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD08xx/EWD831.html

[–] wargreymon@sh.itjust.works -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I know what I am writing, 0 stands for nothing.

[–] cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

yes it means nothing. as in, you take the array, and move the reading position by nothing

[–] wargreymon@sh.itjust.works -2 points 5 months ago

You could phrase it like that for low-level lang, but it is so extra.....

More reason to like Julia