this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
44 points (86.7% liked)

Linux

48364 readers
1326 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
44
what OS should I use instead of xubuntu? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by merompetehla@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I found out that xubuntu spams users including me, which to me is a no go.

I'm looking for a linux based ad free distro that lets me work with libreoffice, vlc, tbb, transmission, okular, pdfarranger, hexchat, gimp and ocr.

I'm going to use it to edit text, watch movies, download multimedia, chat and edit audio with audacity.

it's not going to be a server and I'd like to work with the terminal as much as possible. At the same time, I'm a newbie.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Who needs stable anyway. We all should just use Arch. (Not an excuse Ubuntu showing ads)

Edit: this is a joke

[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We all should just use Arch.

This is the way.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Apparently I need a /s

[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 1 points 5 months ago

I mean, I did get the joke.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Stable means randomly cut off package updates.

Continuous testing and integration is the best way for normal usage. With the iterations "bleeding edge" "fresh" "slightly tested" and "tested"

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I disagree

Fedora works way better than Arch ever will and requires much less upkeep

[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 1 points 5 months ago

So if one wanted to run Arch but were of a similar opinion to you, then they could run Manjaro, which is also a semi-rolling release distro. It’s just on the monthly cadence.

Everyone has their opinions on distros. Doesn’t mean any one opinion is wrong.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes but Fedora is semi-rolling, something in the middle. This is about Ubuntu LTS, a traditional LTS version that cuts off packages on some random version.

This should really only be done if

  1. The programs have a supported LTS/ESR version (Linux Kernel, Firefox, Thunderbird...) (btw GNOME, Chromium etc. dont have one)
  2. The packagers have a lot of time, the users pay money and the packagers actually make those versions as bug free and secure as possible, while keeping the feature freeze

Ubuntu is trying to do 2. but have this separation in there to get money.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago

I would use Debian way before I would use Ubuntu. If 3 years of support isn't enough I would use something RHEL