this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
902 points (98.0% liked)

Comics

5781 readers
188 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine 🇵🇸 . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] none@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Unless you happen to be 2 meters tall, yes, you would give your height in cm. You might round it, but you'd never say you're 1.8m tall.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 3 months ago

1.8 is too imprecise. It includes both 1.80 and 1.89. do you think it's fine to approximate your height to the nearest 4 inches?

Why ever would a 6' 2" person bother with the 2"?

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Never ask why never.

Not when it comes to height measurement.

...Not when it comes to height measurement.

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social -1 points 3 months ago

Lol, I guess I touched a nerve somehow, idk

[–] zout@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well, where I live, 1,85 m is less than average height, 1,90 m is more than average. It's also a noticable difference, especially if you're in the same height range.

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't answer my question at all, but thanks for your input!

[–] zout@fedia.io 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The answer is if you round up to 1 digit, these heights are the same. So we give height in cm's, because otherwise it's not a usefull metric.

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Except numerous people in this thread say they and people they know give their height in meters. So I guess it's not really never then, huh? Just saying, try not to be so absolute about something so inabsolute.

[–] zout@fedia.io 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If they would really give their height in meters, they would almost all be 2 meters except for the very short people.

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago

I mean, you're free to read the comments yourself, but if memory serves, they use decimals. Of course, with the natural logic of the metric system, it's exceedingly easy to convert to centimeters. I just thought it was weird to be so adamant that no one would ever give their height in meters.

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

https://lemmy.world/comment/10320639

https://lemmy.ml/comment/11308542

https://jlai.lu/comment/7453537

https://lemmy.world/comment/10312622

https://lemmy.ml/comment/11308721

That last one is my favorite because they say they only do it in centimeters and then immediately in the next sentence say they also give it in meters, lol.

[–] zout@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The difference is, they say meters but with two decimals, which makes it centimeters.

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago

Well no, it makes it meters, because they're saying "meters" and the number is in meters. Yes it's easily convertible to centimeters, you just move the decimal point. But to say "meters but with two decimals so it's not meters" is obviously, comically, inaccurate.

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 2 points 3 months ago

Where I’m from, some people will still use feet/inches only for heights of human beings (weird, I know), but the most common response is in cm. For instance, if you asked me how tall I am I’d say 173cm, but I would say it like “I’m about a hundred and seventy-three” or “one-seven-three” - you don’t really have to say the units. Much the same as you’d say “I’m five foot seven” and you don’t need to specify “inches”.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Well, if someone asks you about it, they'd like to hear a more precise number. They can easily estimate your height at a precision of 10cm.