this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
52 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10180 readers
309 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
52
GUILTY ON 34 COUNTS (www.washingtonpost.com)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by mozz@mbin.grits.dev to c/politics@beehaw.org
 

You crooked motherfucker

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org 4 points 5 months ago (4 children)

I was shocked to find out that all his crimes apparently don't disqualify him from running for/being president again. Like what?

You would think there would be like... some laws or something.

[–] Domiku@beehaw.org 4 points 5 months ago

I think that it’s actually a good thing. If a criminal record disqualified you, it could be easy to cook up bogus charges against a political opponent just to kick them off the ballot. We also have along history in the USA of black folks getting charged with crimes at a disproportionately high rate.

[–] Vivendi@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 months ago

I heard that it's a mechanism to prevent the ruling president from just locking up every competitor and win the next election by default.

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Why shocked? This is America we’re talking about. I’d be shocked if he actually gets punished at all.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago

I mean it should disqualify him, for all intents and purposes, if we actually had a media that did its job and a non-corrupt Republican Party though.