this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
1030 points (97.4% liked)

Funny

6813 readers
1588 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 22 points 6 months ago (2 children)
 Behavior |  Reasonableneses |

|----------|-----------------------------------| | Substituting applesauce | 8/10 | | One-starring the recipe because it didn't work out | 0/10 |

[–] SeekPie@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Lemmy supports tables? Damn, never seen one here in the comments. Good to know!

[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

I was just winging it and it worked out!

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Except "one-starring the original recipe because the modified recipe didn't work out"

Because otherwise it looks very reasonable instead of very not reasonable

[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

I see your point. If you view the cells as separate contexts, then it would be necessary to specify that "the substitution" is the thing that didn't work out.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"It” refers to the substitution, not the recipe.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

I see your point now. For me it doesn't really read like it, because you have it in another cell of the table which gives it too little weight as a possible context for dereferencing the pronoun, while also having a valid noun preceding the pronoun begging to become referenced by it.

Yeah, I must be fun at parties, I know 😅