this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
78 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17915 readers
39 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Gaywallet@beehaw.org
alyaza@beehaw.org
78
Why FOSS projects are using proprietary, privacy invasive infrastructure? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 5 months ago by JustMarkov@lemmy.ml to c/foss@beehaw.org
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/15691030

As you can easily notice, today many open source projects are using some services, that are… sus.

For example, Github is the most popular place to store your project code and we all know, who owns it. And not to forget that sketchy AI training on every line of your code. Don't we have alternatives? Oh, yes we have. Gitlab, Codeberg, Notabug, etc. You can even host your own Gitea or Forgejo instance if you want.

Also, Crowdin is very popular in terms of software (and docs) translation. Even Privacy Guides and The New Oil use Crowdin, even though we have FLOSS Weblate, that you can easily self-host or use public instances.

So, my question is: if you are building a FLOSS / privacy related project, why using proprietary and privacy invasive tools?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

With SourceHut, other people can submit patches by e-mail, no need to create an account.

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 months ago

I can confirm: i don't have a sourcehut account and have submitted several patches via email there.

[–] hunger@programming.dev 1 points 5 months ago

That unfortunately requires setting up email... I have not bothered doing so on my boxes in a very long time.