this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
149 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37730 readers
639 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ford and GM are probably regretting that switch to NACS...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nighed@sffa.community 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I really want to see the email/message exchange preceding some of these changes at twitter/Tesla.

Is there any pushback/discussion any more, or does Elon just say jump and entire departments vanish?

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 18 points 6 months ago (4 children)

There are rumors that this was an emotional decision from muskrat, and they will probably be offered their jobs back. Just rumors, but still would not be surprising

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 27 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Who would take them? I mean, I guess you gotta get paid, but when someone demonstrated that they can just drop you with zero warning, trust is negative at that point.

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh I agree. There have to be rival companies looking for that exact experience right now. They should not have too much trouble being hired on one of the myriad charging companies out there

[–] GammaGames@beehaw.org 12 points 6 months ago

Especially since the other companies were planning to support the Tesla network…

[–] anlumo@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

I’d rejoin for double the wage I previously had. Need to build up an emergency fund for this precarious position.

[–] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 13 points 6 months ago (3 children)

One article I read said he likes to fire whole teams and then see which people are asked about. Those are the ones he rehires. If nobody misses you then you were doing a job of value.

From a human level, this is just shitty. It isn't the way to treat people.

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 9 points 6 months ago

He sees his employees like slaves as his parents did

[–] anlumo@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

That’s not how research & development works. Nobody asks for a specific person there. Stuff just doesn’t get done.

[–] beefcat@beehaw.org 1 points 6 months ago

it’s also not a good way of actually figuring out who is critical.

you can have people who keep the lights on and if they do their job right few even notice they exist.

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Could be supervillain problems 🤣 comments about wishing someone would go away and an underling resolves it's in a more permanent way .....

Probably not, it's just that his entire exec team are spineless henchman.

I think the spacex team is still independent (ish) for now, I fear for them though!

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well, the exact rumor is he did it to show that he is serious about staffing cuts and that no team is safe, and just made an arbitrary decision

[–] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 6 months ago

With that kind of leadership we should be thankful he can’t run for president, or he’d end up voted in.

[–] wagoner@infosec.pub 2 points 6 months ago

Rumors or wishful thinking, I wonder