this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2024
42 points (97.7% liked)

Programming

17446 readers
103 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I know about software patents but what's the point when somebody can achieve the exact same functionality from the user's perspective using totally different code. Just seems like a waste on a patent lawyer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 28 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Can someone give an example of a time when software patents are good for everyone? Because I can only think of software patents that have prevented the widespread adoption of ideas, and not the opposite.

[–] DudeDudenson@lemmings.world 10 points 7 months ago

I think the original intention was to motivate people to create new technologies. If you spent your life savings designing and prototyping a new product in your shed you don't want a giant company being able to go "cool, thanks I'll make them myself and run you out of business".

The whole point is that you'll invest into it because you'll be able to profit off it afterwards

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 10 points 7 months ago

Isn't that the point, though. Allow someone to profit from it rather than make it free to use. If there is another way to do it, that is not patented but free, they will use that, even if the code is objectively worse. See media codecs for example at the moment.