this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
189 points (99.5% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Russia appears prepared to create “environmental havoc” by sailing unseaworthy oil tankers through the Baltic Sea in breach of all maritime rules, the Swedish foreign minister has said.

Speaking to the Guardian during his first visit to London since Sweden became a Nato member, Tobias Billström called for new rules and enforcement mechanisms to prevent the ageing and uninsured Russian shadow fleet causing an environmental catastrophe. About half of all Russian oil transported by sea passes through the Baltic Sea and Danish waters, often operating under opaque ownership, and using international waters to try to avoid scrutiny.

The fleet generates a huge amount of revenue for Russia’s war machine, bypassing western sanctions that try to block access to insurance if Russia sells the oil above $60 a barrel. In practice as little as 20% of Russian oil is sold below the price cap.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Too bad that torpedoing them would be counterproductive. I guess maybe it could work if you did it on their return voyage, when they're empty.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 8 points 5 months ago

Well, you can always seize those shipments.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Even just blockading them would be an act of war.

[–] OKRainbowKid@feddit.de 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Does knowingly causing an ecological catastrophe qualify as an act of war? To me, that seems worse than blockading these specific ships.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 3 points 5 months ago

That sounds reasonable. They should create a mechanism for blocking ships that pose an ecological risk from entering an EEZ.

[–] Senseless@feddit.de 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Remember that German gas pipeline that randomly exploded? Maybe those vessels just.. explode.. randomly. What a shame. Don't you just hate random self-ignition?

[–] wieson@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago

We just create a new Bermuda triangle myth in the Baltic, blame Nordstream on that and all the following ship disasters.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Be careful around that third-story window, supertanker. I hear it's easy to lose balance