Malicious Compliance

19674 readers

2 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.
We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.
We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

2459

Businesses can discriminate against their customers? Alright then... (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 years ago by minimar@lemmy.world to c/maliciouscompliance@lemmy.world

360 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think I'm confused. I'm pretty sure the court case that the supreme Court just ruled on proved the opposite.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago

You're right in that the current state of the country does not actually reflect the ideals it professes to be based on, and this Supreme Court ruling is proof of that.