World News

22056 readers

128 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

The Brazilian farm workers exploited to harvest an everyday ingredient (www.bbc.com)

submitted 7 months ago by recreationalplacebos@midwest.social to c/news@beehaw.org

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Carnauba wax is a product you may not have heard of, but you have almost certainly consumed it - it is added to sweets to stop them melting, to pills to make them easier to swallow and as a thickener in lipstick and mascara.

Workers in Brazil's poor north-eastern state of Piauí rely on harvesting wax from carnauba palm trees to earn a living. But the power is in the hands of big business who, authorities say, are turning a blind eye to exploitation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I didn't read it that way. What I'm saying is this article doesn't show whether the industry can or can not survive without unpaid externalities, it only shows that the fines are way too low to be a deterrent. It also seems like there is room to spend at least some extra $30K on reasonable salaries and habitation, and still make a profit.

Likewise, mankind would move away from oil if all externalities were accounted and paid for.

That's what they used to say in the early 2000s about "carbon offsets": make the externality accounted for, and... well, we can see how that one is working out, can't we?

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

True, it doesn’t show that. A leap of logic on my part.

Carbon offsets assumes players would play fair, but the whole system was rigged from the get go.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago

Rigged is one part, people playing the system is another... but even IF we took it all at face value, no rigging, everyone playing fair...

What's the goal corporations think people want them to aim for? Being "carbon neutral"?... WTF even is that; we need to become "carbon negative", to reverse the damage that's already been done, not just go on polluting and pay someone else to hopefully clean up some of it, maybe, some day.

The public shouldn't accept anything less than "we buy twice the carbon offsets of our emissions" from corporations... but no, they show up with "planning to become carbon neutral in just 25 more years", and the public is like "oh cool, that extra pair of sneakers I don't need, is so eco-green"... 🤦