this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
116 points (79.6% liked)

politics

18883 readers
4025 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This direct contradiction of clearly articulated administration policy is possible because because of the bank’s nominal independence. It makes its own decisions and evaluates its own deals—it’s supposed to conduct transactions that support the American economy, free from political interference.

I see you have taken to heart my advice about making more subtle and "what? it's technically true"-defensible postings, that through the phrasing of their headline still feed the narrative that Biden's bad for the climate even though he pushed through a climate bill that's predicted to reduce US emissions by 40% in the next 6 years, and this particular financing deal is only tangentially related to him. (In the article it says the bank is actually forbidden by law from choosing deals to finance or not based on which industry they relate to.)

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Vote for Biden. Seriously. I don't care. Just know what you're voting for.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

A 40% reduction in emissions and continued American democracy?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

But I mean, the man isn't 100% on what I want. So obviously we have to abstain, causing the end of democracy in this shit system.

[–] CrazyFrog97@discuss.online 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] june@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Name a reasonable (see: electable) alternative who is

  1. better on Israel
  2. better for the economy
  3. can beat trump

Until you can you should probably stfu because if you think it’s better to see Biden lose to trump over Israel, you’re going to be pretty damn disappointed when trump puts boots on the ground to help Israel.

[–] skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

I'm tired of seeing this worn out point. What exactly would you propose he do that is:

  1. Actually possible for him to do

  2. Not going to make the situation worse

  3. Not something he is already doing

Don't get me wrong, I don't like what Israel is doing either but the US has painted themselves into a corner long before the Biden admin. We can't stop supporting Israel without basically ceding control of the region to Iran, and I guarantee Iran will do shit that will make Israel look like Mr. Rogers by comparison.

I'm not saying there's nothing he could be doing better, but I don't see any productive discussion from the people calling him Genocide Joe.

And all that aside, he's still by far the preferable alternative to Don Cheeto who would likely actually be a genocide enabler.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I mean... I don't see eye to eye with the man on certain things either but... Do you think Trump is going to do better when it comes to fossil fuels? He's going to fight for the environment harder?

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

nobody is saying you should vote for Trump either

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Those are our options. He's saying make sure you know what you're getting into if you vote for Biden...

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I expect to have at least four names on my ballot. you can choose from any of them.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes a third party candidate winning would be nice. But do you think this election, when we risk having Trump again, is the year to try to divide the votes like that? When, we both know, they're zero chance in hell of a third party candidate winning anytime soon?

Maybe down the road we'll get there. But right now the only actual choices are Trump and Biden. That's just the world we live in. I'm not happy with it either, just like I wasn't happy with having to pick Clinton or Trump.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

i didn't vote for biden in 2012 or 2020. i won't be doing it this year. if you're worried about dividing the vote, you should help me decide whether we're voting for jill stein or cornel west.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm sorry but you live in a land of delusion. That's just not happening this time. We're not there yet. And you posting slightly snarky comments on a very tiny website like this isn't what's going to turn the tide and turn this into a third party country.

We only have two options. I'm not happy with it either but that's where we are.

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I know you're planning on splitting the vote by voting for the conservative instead of a leftist, but I'm not calling you delusional. I'm certainly not lying about how many people are on the ballot.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I never claimed you are lying? Did you respond to the right person?

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

you lied about how many choices we have.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I've literally acknowledged multiple times that there will be other people on the ballot, I simply am saying over and over in reality it's going to be Biden or Trump.

You claiming that I called you a liar and now you claiming that I'm lying... This isn't you being disingenuous is it? You actually didn't understand what I've been saying all this time did you?

You honestly haven't been following this conversation at all, have you?

[–] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You claiming that I called you a liar

that's not what i said. i was contrasting my honesty with your dishonesty.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I'm sorry but this is where I tap out. You're clearly not really following this conversation at all and there's no point continuing it :)

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Isn't one of his stated campaign promises literally "drill, drill, drill, baby!"

[–] proper@lemmy.world -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thank you! yours is a noble crusade keeping up with these jokers. I’ve also notice there are 3 bad-actor posters, and coincidentally every comment of descent gets their 3 downvotes.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 2 points 6 months ago

It's a few more than 3 🙂

Pro tip, votes on Lemmy (or any federated app) are not at all private