this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
785 points (98.2% liked)

PC Gaming

8581 readers
829 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 108 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Revenue per head is no doubt a sexy metric, especially for private companies. If it was a public company then investors would call for the company to try and grow its overall profits by spending more on growth related initiatives... Perhaps by releasing half-life 3 for example, lol.

The great thing about keeping your company private is that you can get it just where you like and keep it there no matter what outside parties want. I could totally see Gaben is perfectly satisfied making bank at this level while also having a chill lifestyle.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 61 points 8 months ago

If the company were public the shareholders would say “great, now give the employees less and give us the difference”

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Why is money per employer a better metric than customer satisfaction?

Should an owner be more proud of their yatch size or of being a role model for customers not other millionaires? What's their passion really, money or what they do for a living?

We clearly know where valve wants to be. I'm just surprised it's a company that stands out.

Fuck shareholders.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

It's not a better metric. It's a metric among others.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

They said it's a sexy metric, as in big numbers are cool. They never said it's a particularly useful or "better" metric.

[–] Spoke0thedevil@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

The article is talking about net income per head, not revenue.