Malicious Compliance

19674 readers

2 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.
We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.
We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

2459

Businesses can discriminate against their customers? Alright then... (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 years ago by minimar@lemmy.world to c/maliciouscompliance@lemmy.world

360 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is a problem with the US legal system. Every decision is a precedent, no matter how specific it is.

[–] Zyansheep@vlemmy.net 4 points 2 years ago

Well, Roe v Wade set a precedent, which was then reverted ~50 years later, so I'm not sure how much precedents apply to the supreme court (it definitely applies to lower courts tho)

[–] Belgdore@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

This is how common law everywhere that England colonized works. It’s not endemic to the US.