this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
1116 points (97.6% liked)
Facepalm
2610 readers
8 users here now
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Hmm, I wonder how many people that believe this would also happen to be the people who raise hell when nobody gives enough of a shit to make their burger right..
They are also the people who complain because things like self checkout/self serve come about, then they suddenly miss the "old days" when you'd actually have a conversation with the checkout person.
Do you miss the days when people could do those jobs and support a household? Or do you want to be served by faceless robots? Its one or the other.
Wouldn't self checkout be the opposite? If companies had to pay a living wage, they'd be even more eager to replace the humans with machines
What? You think that companies are paying minimum wage out of the goodness of their heart? If they could cut minimum wage workers for robots, I feel like more than 90% of companies would do this
yeah I'm saying paying more would exacerbate that.
Also tbh, when you account for the extra theft those machines allow, they're not much cheaper than minimum wage workers, otherwise there would def be a lot more of them, including outside of big stores.
How do self-checkout machines allow for extra theft? Sounds more like a problem of cheaping out on employees to watch the check-out area if you ask me. You can hire one employee to watch over multiple self-checkouts the entire time, and end up paying less, many stores do that and it works.
I'm in a relatively rural area and pretty much every general store here has a lot of self-checkouts, and they're usually busier than the human checkouts (because it's way faster and more convenient).
Even without having people at self-checkouts, and assuming that allows people to steal more, theft is pretty much negligible compared to profits from additionally having the self-checkouts in the first place. Many people find it less of a hassle to go grocery shopping if it means they don't have to have a cashier check them out, and the throughput is higher.
A lot of times big box stores close down and blame it on theft, but in reality it's never theft, usually it's because the workers were about to unionize, or because upper management needed a scapegoat for below expected profits from the store.
If you don't pay the people watching over the self checkouts a living wage, then why would they care to stop theives? I sure wouldn't protect the corporation who is exploiting me
you can say the same about stealing in general. what's stopping them from just rolling out of the store with everything in their cart? or hiding stuff in their clothes?
The self-checkout should make life better because less workers are needed to perform the same work. However under capitalism everyone needs a job to survive. Additionally, the theft issue wouldn't be an issue if people were able to just grab what they need and leave the store, no paying a corporation before you go. But a non-capitalist society feels like a pipe dream.
Or get bent out of shape about how everything is being automated...