this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
13 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59389 readers
3187 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
13
Painful day for tech titans as EU finally sinks its regulatory teeth into them (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 8 months ago by celmit@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No it isn’t. Stop making shit up.

I've even seen benchmarks. In my own experience it's slow where default KDE5 is fast. I didn't dig why, because I'm not going to use a full-fledged DE over my cozy FVWM setup anyway.

Also accusing better people than you of lying is impolite.

Gnome is easily the most consistent DE out there. By far. Honestly, by far and away the most consistent. Even MacOS is less consistent, and that’s saying something.

I already guessed that's your opinion, but OK. "Even"? It's the same horror as MacOS.

So a Windows UX clone. Not everything has to be yet another Windows clone. What happened to you not preferring Windows UX lol

It can look like Gnome 3 UX clone too, and that's how it looked when I used it. Just more consistent and usable.

Anyway, there's such a thing as ergonomics. It's not really subjective, it can be measured in clicks and keystrokes, with accounting for mistakes and searching for elements of UI. Gnome devs are clearly ignorant of it.

MacOS and Gnome are sometimes worse than even modern Windows in that regard.

BTW, about Windows - w2k and xp were very good in terms of ergonomics.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You're lying. That's why I called you a liar.

Gnome is the most consistent. That's an objective, factual statement.

No, you talked about a Windows UX clone. We get it, you want everything to be a Windows clone.

Just more consistent

Lmao

Anyway, there's such a thing as ergonomics.

Something gnome does very well and Windows and its clones don't.

Honestly, I don't know why only Gnome devs seems to care about consistency and ergonomics. It's maddening.

BTW, about Windows - w2k and xp were very good in terms of ergonomics.

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

HAHAHAHAHAA

HAHAHAHA

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

AHAHAHAHAHA

HAHAHAHAH

Lol

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

So you don't have any arguments and apparently think that repeating shit will make it true.

Any amount of "HAHAHA" is not an argument, and like I said, ergonomics is not a subjective thing.