Linux
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
view the rest of the comments
I mean if I didn’t want to use GNU at all I would just run FreeBSD. Been a solid OS for me since the mid 2000’s.
I am out of the loop: What is the discussion/problem with GNU?
Historically the concerns have been that the GPL is less “free” than the BSD license.
This draws parallels with tolerance paradox.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
Which is funny because the only thing really that I see people say that because is the fact that you can't remove freedoms from the program then pass it onto users.
The GPL keeps software free forever. It's more free overall.
The likes of BSD are pushover licenses. They'll let you strip the freedom from them, but that results in the end users getting less or no freedom.
On topic of the original post, I actually make an effort to use more GNU software. I love it, I love the software, I love the philosophy. I want more of that.
True. Don't know why I didn't think of that. I'm assuming the BSDs don't use GNU's C compiler?
FreeBSD has used the LLVM Clang compiler for over 10 years
Thanks