this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
42 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

59389 readers
2841 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As fast as the web is now, I'm no-longer a fan of pressuring browser developers on performance. What we really need is to improve browser interoperability.

Rendering engines are constantly adding support for awesome new features... but those features can't really be used until all the other browsers decide to implement the same feature - which tends to be years later. I'm a huge fan of the "Interop" project, which maintains a list of web technologies everyone agrees should be cross platform and pressures rendering engines to implement those features. The list of features changes every year.

https://wpt.fyi/interop-2024?stable

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm for both. A bit of pressure to avoid bloat and smoothly handle occasionally stressful situations is a good thing.

[–] starman@programming.dev 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Most of this bloated is caused by actual websites, not browsers

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The features are the bloat.

Websites couldn't use 1,000x the cycles the content warrants for the sole purpose of spying on users if browsers didn't let them run arbitrary code.

[–] kevincox@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You obviously never browsed the web with jQuery javascript-based animations in 2006.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Minimal is far, far better than jam packed with ads and fucking spyware. You can do plenty with html tagged text, images/video, and some CSS for layout.

The whole reason adblockers are necessary is because half the web thinks having popup videos pop up over popup videos is acceptable behavior. It's all because browsers do far more than they need to.