this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
26 points (88.2% liked)

Selfhosted

39903 readers
463 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I own a couple TP-Link Tapo Wi-fi light bulbs. Currently, each family member installs an app on the phone to control the light bulbs. I wonder if there's a way to do the same but in a browser (via docker app on my NAS). And because we may use smart devices of other brands in the future, it seems too much trouble to install yet another app on each phone.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 23 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's what home assistant is built to do. There is a docker version, but I hit limits pretty quick and fired up an old raspberry pi running HomeassistantOS

One app, many devices & brands, custom interfaces for each member.

[–] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It was many, many years ago, but if I recall some of the add-ons or installations didn't work in the docker version. I started with docker on a Synology server, but I gave up on the whole project for a year until I found a Pi in a drawer I forgot I had.

HAOS just feels more "complete" to me.

[–] TDCN@feddit.dk 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Addons on HAOS are just Docker containers. When you use HA in Docker you have to just install the addons you like yourself as containers next to HA. It gives you more freedom to change settings for the "addons" when you install them yourself, but it is also a little more work. I think it is still worth it because you can also just install whatever you want. I run a minecraft server for example on the same server.

[–] Pohl@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

HAOS is a managed operating system, which is perfect for people who want to automate their home but don’t want to manage a Linux machine. It’s a little wild to me to see a person in this community advocating a managed OS. Like, what are we even doing here??

I killed HAOS and set it up in docker because it was phoning home a lot. Sometimes there were hundreds of dns queries a minute to HA servers. No thanks.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Haha! I feel like I got a little roasted and have some learning to do, but this hobby is all good fun.

I'm definitely not hating on docker. I use it for dozens of containers across several machines and love how easy it is, and even some of the fights we've had. If that works for people's needs, awesome!

I really wish I remembered what the error was. It's been bugging me all day. Maybe it's not a thing anymore.

[–] Pohl@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ha, I roasted you for having the good sense to let somebody else handle some of this stuff for you.

Nobody in crazy rabbit hole club is allowed to do anything the easy way!!

[–] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 1 points 7 months ago

Nginx Proxy Manager is for scrubs, anyone who doesn't code their confs by hand is subhuman!

/s

[–] TDCN@feddit.dk 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Do you have anything more to back up the claims about haos breaking privacy other than sone DNS queries? Just because there is a DNS query doesn't mean any actual data is being sent. I'm only asking because I'd be sad to hear if there are really issues. HA is fully open source so I'm surprised if this is really and issue.

[–] Pohl@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I definitely did not claim it was braking privacy. As far as I can tell it was just querying an update server but for some reason it was doing it with such frequency (hundreds a minute for hours out of the day) that I deemed it was broken and that the OS was not managed well.

Other people took a more suspicious view but mostly they just lost my trust that they had any business running a system on my network. If you google around you can get more nuanced takes I don’t actually know if they ever fixed it.

[–] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ah. I'm running HA out of docker currently and haven't hit any walls, but I'm not exactly pushing it. There's an annoyance where I have to tell HA to trust my docker's default IP, and there was some reverse-proxy messing around I had to do to get it working on my network. Once it's up and loaded, it's indistinguishably HomeAssistant.

[–] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 2 points 7 months ago

I run mine behind a reverse proxy too and had to do that as well. Seems like a common thing there should be a system config for.