this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2024
385 points (99.5% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
poVoq@slrpnk.net
385
EU president congratulates Putin on ‘landslide’ win … as Russian voting kicks off (www.politico.eu)
submitted 6 months ago by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.de
41 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sudoreboot@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm curious as to what you think about the actual meaning of those sentences, then. Do you think that there ought to be protection against consequences, regardless of what one says? Should there be any exceptions at all? What is the domain of applicability? Certain types of expression, certain types of topics, intended audience, etc?

Edit: oh and what about freedom from? Is there any situation in which a person has a right to shut someone down from "expressing themselves" to them without their consent?