this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
294 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy Guides

16106 readers
73 users here now

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It puts a lot of features at the fingertips of the faithful, including the ability to filter whole neighborhoods by religion, ethnicity, “Hispanic country of origin,” “assimilation,” and whether there are children living in the household.

Its core function is to produce neighborhood maps and detailed tables of data about people from non-Anglo-European backgrounds, drawn from commercial sources typically used by marketing and data-harvesting firms.

training videos produced by users show the extent to which evangelical groups are using sophisticated ways to target non-Christian communities, with questionable safeguards around security and privacy.

In one instance, he points to the sharable note-taking function and suggests leaving information for each household, such as “Daughter left for college” and “Mother is in the hospital.”

increasingly popular among Christian supremacist groups, prayerwalking calls on believers to wage “violent prayer” (persistently and aggressively channeling emotions of hatred and anger against Satan), engage in “spiritual mapping” (identifying areas where evil is at work, such as the darkness ruling over an abortion clinic, or the “spirit of greed” ruling over Las Vegas), and conduct prayerwalking (roaming the streets in groups, “praying on-site with insight”).

newly arrived refugees might well find a knock on the door from strangers with knowledge of their personal circumstances distressing—and that’s before these surprise visitors even begin to attempt to convert them.

placing people of different ethnic and religious backgrounds on easy-to-access databases is a dangerous road to go down

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Totally fair point - there's more than one type of Christian and not everyone in the faith has homogeneous opinions or actions.

Unfortunately (fortunately?) for your faith - the ones steering the ship politically are hyper right wing convert /submit or die types.

Until Christian denominations meaningfully split or works against the goals from evangelicals/Christian nationalists, you're effectively sitting at the same table and will be judged accordingly.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'd like to know what you meant by evangelical. I'd consider myself evangelical in that I believe in evangelism (telling people about Jesus) and in the evangel (the Gospel,) but every time I hear the word used by non-Christians, it's regarded like it's a flavor of fascism or something.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because it is absolutely a flavor of fascism.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Can you describe what it is? When you use the word evangelical, is that a synonym for christofascism, or something more specific?

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

By the way, my extended family are all what you would call "good christians" and they're all trump supporters because their pastor is, and the scales do not fall from their eyes and they do not recognize an antichrist when they see one though he keeps screaming out loud to them I AM AN ANTICHRIST!!!!!!!

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It is a synonym for christofascism. "Fire and brimstone" ideology that divides "sinners" from "saved". ANY recognition of a punishment dealt in afterlife or perceived "wrath of god" in this life. Any usurpation of the First Amendment that ejects freedom FROM religion. Use of broadcast and cable media to spread this very bad news. Prayer in schools. Grooming children with Sunday School classes.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Fascism is when a Christian believes Hell exists?

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes. Yes, it is. It is a cult of fear and death and division and hatred. Hell isnt even part of your scriptures and never has been; it was made up after the fact when you saw how other mythologies used it.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

What about it? Added in later, originally "cast into the lake of fire" which is "throw into a volcano"....presumably the same volcano that the Hebrews thought was god's tent in Exodus

[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

That's because it is the closest thing to fascism. Especially when religion bleeds into politics.

Don't be shocked that your faith of complete, uncompromising, control of human behaviour based on a collective, personal conclusion that you have all the answers to everything is perceived for what it is.

Believe whatever you want in your own head, and live your life according to whatever belief system you want. The second you try to extend the control you place on yourself to anyone else is the line between faith and fascism

If you don't believe in abortions? Fine.

If you believe others should follow your example? Fine.

If you force others to follow your idealogies through control of legal/political systems? not fine

Y'all never seem to understand, nobody cares what you do as long as you keep self imposed control to yourself. But apparently the whole point is to "spread the love" through non-optional participation, which is what makes you so dangerous.

If your faith really was all that goodness you claim, people would actually want to join! But they don't. So you force them. Jesus would be so proud ❤️

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

You seem to be putting words in my mouth. People I know that talk to me about these sorts of things know that this isn't how I think at all.

I never claim to have all the answers, and there's a lot I don't know about the Bible. In fact, if you talk to me about the biblical stance of abortion in particular, I'll say that I don't know at what point someone becomes a person, and the Bible doesn't give a clear answer - if anything, it implies that you're a person before you're even conceived, which could mean that not having kids is murder, but that's ridiculous and obviously wrong.

I also never push for controlling others. As I said in another thread here, it has to be a choice, otherwise God might as well control us all directly. And I definitely never try to use the law as a tool to make others moral. If the law were capable of making people moral, there would be no need for Jesus.

By the way, there are people out there who think Christians are evil for believing others should think the same way they do even if they agree it's optional. I've met them. I'm not lumping you in with them, just contradicting your claim that nobody cares.

EDIT: By the way, you didn't define evangelical. If it's not too much trouble, I would like to know how you define it.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have NEVER heard of ANY christian group speaking out against evangelical attempts to control others. NEVER.

I have NEVER heard of ANY christian organization standing up to government officials to say NO WE DO NOT WANT TO FORCE OUR GOD OR IDEOLOGY ON OTHERS THROUGH GOVERNMENT FORCE. Which is weird because government force is proof that there is no god and/or he has no power of his own.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Try asking your nearest pastor. It's hard for real Christian statements to get around. Where are you going to hear it?

The news? They won't share it because it's not really news. They don't share much besides events, and news networks are biased towards negative events and crimes, which would generally be perpetrated by fake Christians (like christofascists.)

Social media? Christian statements don't trend because there are too many Christian-haters that downvote and argue. The closest you get is "look at these evil christofascists" kind of stuff like this.

Word of mouth and one-on-one conversations is by far the best way.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

But see that's the part you dont get: there is NO REASON for christian statements to get around. Yours is the only religion that demands that you be a fucking pest to everyone else. You dont know to stop once someone is saved; you switch immediately to cult grooming. It's a religion of evil, not good; a cult of death, not peace. The long term goals are the same as they have always been: scour the earth of infidels.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Not gonna lie, this sounds like:

"I've never heard of any Christian saying anything against being evil in this way."
"That's because you don't hear from Christians. Try asking one."
"There's no reason to hear from Christians, they're evil in that way."

Frankly, this sounds like it's going to be a long and tiring conversation. If you militantly believe that something so simple as telling a friend that Jesus loves them is an act of fascism, I don't think this is going to be productive or enjoyable for either of us.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Another lie you told here: you mitigated it down to me speaking of one person.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And right there you have committed your first lie. You know damn well that none of this is about "simply telling a friend that Jesus loves them". None of it.

This is why you are evil: blatant and shameless attempts to shame and manipulate.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You think I'm arguing in bad faith, I think you're arguing in bad faith. None of us is going to convince the other, so I'm dropping out here.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Christianity is bad faith argument by definition.

[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Regardless of your personal actions or beliefs, you are being lumped in with extremists. If that confuses you because you personally feel innocent, there is an expression that goes something like

"If there are 9 people at a table and a Nazi sits and eats with them, there are 10 Nazis as the table."

Tolerating or being indifferent to abhorrent behaviour is the same as rewarding/endorsing abhorrent behaviour.

As for the definition of evangelicals, there's the literal definition

"Evangelicalism (/ˌiːvænˈdʒɛlɪkəlɪzəm, ˌɛvæn-, -ən-/), also called evangelical Christianity or evangelical Protestantism, is a worldwide interdenominational movement within Protestant Christianity that emphasizes the centrality of sharing the "good news" of Christianity, being "born again" in which an individual experiences personal conversion, as authoritatively guided by the Bible, God's revelation to humanity.[1][2][3][4][5] The word evangelical comes from the Greek word for "good news" (euangelion).[6]"

And then there is the applied practice of evangelicals who spend considerable wealth influencing politics to turn America (and the world) into a theocratic state with the goal of converting everyone and doing away with anyone who resists their goals.

They are uncompromising because they believe they act on God's will giving them unquestionable holy authority to act as they see fit as long as it pushes their narrative and goals.

It's not my job to educate you on your own religion, if you're lost as to why anyone would despise evangelicals even though "they're not all like that" that is up to you to reconcile.

There might be a subtle difference between a front lines Nazi and Hitler on the 'innocence scale' if you want to split hairs, but to everyone outside that group, a Nazi is a Nazi (who were all essentially evangelicals as well, surprise surprises)

if you don't believe me, here's something to read since you like proof/evidence so much, but I doubt you'll ever challenge your own beliefs.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

So what I'm seeing here is that I'm being accused of fascism because some people I never met who claim to share my religion are fascists. But apparently that's a justified accusation because apparently I have no issues with them.

It wasn't okay to lump Muslims in with Al-Qaeda. Why is this okay? Because the people you're lumping me in with are in power?