this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
138 points (99.3% liked)

Ukraine

8235 readers
979 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PinkOwls@feddit.de 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Are there not valuable targets closer to Ukrainian territory?

This would allow the Russians to concentrate their air defense close to Ukraine. Striking targets far beyond the front forces the Russians not only to spread their air defense thin, but they also have to decide which sites they leave undefended. Pulling their air defense away from the front, it also means that Ukrainian F-16s and other planes will have more freedom to operate in the region.

And the strategic reason has already been mentioned: Striking targets like refineries makes the war more costly to the Russians, it deprives them of income, they possibly can't repair them because of sanctions, a.s.o. And obviously you want to bring the war to your enemy's territory because the enemy is already creating lots of destruction in your country.

[–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Makes sense. St. Petersburg just seemed like a very long reach. More for technical reasons than anything. But kudos for pulling it of.