this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
36 points (89.1% liked)

PC Gaming

8488 readers
630 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 48 points 8 months ago (4 children)

$749

Windows

Done, I've read enough.

[–] Pohl@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It’s crazy to me the way that all of the also-ran handhelds seem bent on putting a desktop OS on these things. The steam deck didn’t succeed in spite of its lack of windows, it succeeded BECAUSE it ran a purpose built OS.

Like imagine looking at a market where the Switch exists and saying “My path to victory is Microsoft Windows, that is what the people are demanding!”

Even worse is that there almost certainly going to be some sort of handheld optimized windows release in the coming years from MS and they have zero incentive to license it to hardware OEMs. Best case for MSI et al is that they build a market for MS to steal from them in a year or two.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There already is a handheld optimized MS OS, the xbox. It's made to be used with a controller on screen of any size, if they baked in the support for PC games they would be 90% of the way to a Steam Deck.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 7 months ago

It's crazy to me that there's not already a handheld Xbox. Or that they don't at least license the software the same way they do with Windows.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget,

Intel integrated graphics

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Are they that much better than AMD?

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 7 months ago

They're not better at all. I'm guessing Intel paid them to make it because that's the only explanation that makes sense.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But it comes with 7 days of Ubisoft+ for free!

Which is like a double insult. 7 days is a pittance but it's also Ubisoft who think AAAA is just a price point.

Also I wonder what the battery life is like with the Intel silicon.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

That's a reason I would not buy this

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Thank you for saving me so much time.