this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
135 points (93.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21219 readers
141 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Pantherina@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    Plasma 6 is the most tested release EVER. There where at least 5 ways to test it, there was KDE Neon and a dedicated atomic Fedora image for it.

    There are many bugs only fixed in Plasma 6.

    So it is debateable

    [–] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

    Both of you misunderstand the point of Debian's stability.
    When I run Debian Stable I want to be sure nothing changes about how the system works, until I have time to plan an upgrade.
    So KDE6 could have literally zero bugs and it still wouldn't make sense to push it into a current Debian release, because it has new features.

    [–] Pantherina@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    I think backwards compatibility is the keyword here. That would be the biggest requirement to allow updates.

    New bugs, and maybe for example new hardening policies needed, could be another one. Maybe a future firefox implements feature x and you want to / have to disable that.

    But at the same time Firefox is the best example of upstream doing the versioning. They know when to freeze features and likely backport every security critical issue. Thats not the case with many other packages debian ships, where it just doesnt ship updates whatsoever.