this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
368 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

60082 readers
5235 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Counties are blocking wind and solar across the US::Local governments across the U.S. are blocking new clean energy plants. See the best locations for wind and solar power, and where it's being stopped.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'll take imperfect up/down vote usage that helps filter out the worst takes the majority of the time over letting horrible people appear to be on the same level as a reasonable take.

In general I try to go back on downvoted posts to see if I was unclear to improve it for next time. But I am guilty of relying on prior voters knowing about context and end up using group concensus to vote posts up or down when they are a bit unclear on intent, so can't really blame others that donthe same.

I try and not assume the worst in people, but over time it is getting really hard not to knowing how common it is for malicious actors to use subtle hints to sway opinion.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In general I try to go back on downvoted posts to see if I was unclear to improve it for next time. But I am guilty of relying on prior voters knowing about context and end up using group concensus to vote posts up or down when they are a bit unclear on intent, so can’t really blame others that donthe same.

I'm not sure why, but it was the beginning of your second paragraph where my urge to reflexively downvote you (after having been primed by seeing the existing score) was strongest. It might be because I skimmed over the "that can be addressed" part, or just that "disruption to the local area" is a relatively weak criticism and citing it as your primary example set off my reactionary spidey-sense a little.

Frankly, I'm not sure what you could've done differently. Maybe change that first sentence to something like "That said, the reasons locals oppose large scale projects aren't always entirely invalid?"

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 1 points 10 months ago

This is great feedback!

I feel like trying to start positive feels like saying "I agree with everything, BUT..." so I tend to reinforce at the end to reinforce my overall point with context. Maybe that is just me and how many times I see people say they agree and then completely disagree for the rest of the post.

Thank you for taking the time!