this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
302 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

59373 readers
8073 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] joneskind@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

TBF This is how luxury car manufacturers sell their options. Always have been.

Space Karen sells his false self-driving option for €7500 as a software option.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but historically the purchase of an option included the physical installation of that option and its associated hardware. Not just turning on parts of the car that are already in it, after you bought it.

To be clear, I don't think anyone is arguing that options should not cost money. We're arguing against A) recurring subscriptions, and B) paying more money to activate features already built into the car you already bought.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

Do you feel that Tesla’s charging for self driving is unfair?

[–] dimath@ttrpg.network 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I know the current circlejork but last time I've checked the self-driving required an additional processer inside the car.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

For many options in cars, the sensors and electronics are already built in but disabled in software. It's cheaper to build while optimizing profit with options.