this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
1540 points (96.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54476 readers
787 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

wow just wow while i can't say i didn't see this one coming but it always amazes me where greed could lead someone

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mr_right@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 year ago (6 children)

i don't want to be a buzz kill but if this train continue its course i am afraid that they gonna do something about youtube-dl

[–] TwilightKiddy@programming.dev 17 points 1 year ago

And then there will be another fork that does something about their something. Just like what happened to Vanced, for example.

[–] salarua@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

they wouldn't be able to do anything. youtube-dl doesn't use an API or anything like that, it just streams the video like a browser would and rips the stream. if they somehow actually managed to selectively block youtube-dl, all youtube-dl would have to do is send a different user agent. the only defense against stream ripping in general is to not stream anything at all, which Youtube obviously cannot do

[–] Potato@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

No, when they decide to end yt-dl (and similar tools) they will just enable DRM on all videos, rather than just the pay-per-view videos. The infrastructure already exists for Netflix-like DRM on YouTube. If they are serious about cracking down on ad blocking then it is a matter of time before they throw that switch.

[–] fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And yet somehow you're still able to rip video from places like Netflix.

There's always a way around it. It's simply a cat and mouse game.

[–] Potato@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

There are tools to record mediocre quality video from Netflix (flixgrab) and there is an exploit that the scene groups use to nab webdls but there's nothing quality for normal users.

[–] iod@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you have some links about this new DRM for youtube? If it's true its very sad indeed.

When will the internet bless us with a good yt competitor

[–] Potato@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

No, I've seen no plans to expand DRM on YouTube but the paid videos have been DRM from the start, so they very much have the software internally in place to do it. And third party apps using a YouTube-dl backend provide a workaround against ad blocker bans so if they're serious about this....

[–] mr_right@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

i agree that stopping stream ripping is indeed impossible ,what i am afraid (and think) that they gonna put small hurdles in the way until they become a big shore to overcome and this is a worst case scenario but may be they gonna implement DRM like netflix does in the future

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago

There would always be some ways to save the video as long as it's played on your machine

[–] Akovia@latte.isnot.coffee 6 points 1 year ago

This is terrifying.

[–] SJ_Zero@lemmy.fbxl.net 3 points 1 year ago

What's happened with invidious suggests it's already starting in that regard.

[–] whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

A long as there is a way to view a video, there will be a way to save it.