this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
425 points (96.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5243 readers
493 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
425
Big cars are dead weight dragging down climate policy (ketanjoshi.co)
submitted 9 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
51 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wildcherry@slrpnk.net -5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Ok, so first of all, the fact that I am getting downvoted shows the extend of car-related propaganda, even in "leftists" and "ecologically conscious" space. It's sad, really, I thought I would belong here. Apparently not :(

Seconds, as I said above, they won't put trainlines on a route where everybody's taking their cars already.

[–] ex_06@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think you are getting downvoted by a mix of people who think about it being a bit ableist policy (even tho you did include that for people who need it they should be able to take it) but also just because it's full of US people. They are just 4% of the world population yet they act like we should talk about solutions taking them into account everytime. It's one of the reasons that made me give ownership of slrpnk to another person, I feel like it's a bit pointless to talk about organizing while the userbase is so spread and often so US focussed, they are basically behind in every policy.

Just move on, don't worry my friend

[–] wildcherry@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 months ago

Thanks friend I appreciate :)

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I think you're right. I'd want pay-per-use, networked vehicles I don't own but can opt in to use. Also want "Call car" button in every home so if you need to go to work, get groceries etc, you push it an within 10 mins a vehicle rolls up for use.

I don't think it'll fly until we have reliable, safe self driving (so lol, not a Tesla) and we change our attitude towards what a vehicle is for, and why to own one.

Owing a vehicle today has been twisted into a statement of one's "rugged individualism" (coughs mass produced car coughs) and threats to this are an attack on "muh FREEDERMS". Just watch literally any dodge ram commercial, or anything for an SUV where a starry eyed child is being driven through a forest by parents in an SUV. It's an image, manufactured want. Not need.

(Edit: spelling)

[–] wildcherry@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 months ago

I agree. Realistically I think cars still have their places in society for people who work and stuff. But ffs let's put decent train and trolleys and buses services first, at least in urban area.