this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
22 points (92.3% liked)
Space
8746 readers
11 users here now
Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Picture of the Day
The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula
Related Communities
๐ญ Science
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !space@beehaw.org
- !space@lemmy.world
๐ Engineering
๐ Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No, I think they'll have another delay. It seems like everything is endlessly delayed these days.
I don't really get the bit about this being the furthest we've traveled. We've sent people to the Moon before. Isn't this mission doing the same thing?
The furthest weโve traveled milestone is not really worth mentioning for Artemis III. Sure they will be granted a Guinness book of world records entry for beating Apollo 13โs record by a smidge. However, it is one of the least significant accomplishments they will have on this epic journey.
A smidge is right. It sounds like they're going 10,000km away from the far side of the Moon. To compare, the Moon's average distance is 385,000km, so they'll actually be 395,000km away?
Except that's probably off by a few thousand km; the 385,000 figure is the average distance from the center of the Earth to the center of the Moon. Meh, correcting for center vs. radius is starting to sound like homework, so this will have to be "close enough for a Lemmy comment" :)
Edit: OP posted another article in a comment; Artemis II will actually be 432,194km away. Sounds like "a smidge" is about 10% of the distance in this case!
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/nasa-announces-the-astronaut-crew-for-artemis-ii-lunar-flyby/
I don't know the reason why the distance is further but I would imagine it is intentional to increase speed or some other technical reason.
Actually since they are further away from the moon, they'll most likely be moving slower (relative to the moon). Higher orbit = slower travel.
Ah, you know your orbital mechanics :D
I did some looking and found this question on Stackexchange. The diagram was super helpful for me -- it's pretty intuitive to see where the mission is going.
Also, thanks for posting that article! It had a reference to http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-112622a-artemis-i-breaks-apollo-13-distance-earth-record.html which cited the actual records (talking about Artemis I, not II):
...
So they're actually going 32,000km past the previous record. It's interesting that they're using such a far-flung lunar orbit.
Aren't they going further out for a more efficient insertion into the Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit which Lunar Gateway will be in?