this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
71 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37592 readers
146 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frog@beehaw.org 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Making sure their turnover also gets split into hundreds of companies seems like an administrative nightmare though. And I suspect the EU regulators are smart enough to see through such a ruse - eBay would still be one website, not hundreds, after all.

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, exactly. 10MM is peanuts to huge tech companies. It's not reasonable to split up services in a way that would still be profitable.

The Fediverse would likely be exempt, but any social media with advertising and any scale at all will hit 10MM revenue pretty quickly.

[–] frog@beehaw.org 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think the fact that the Fediverse is genuinely and legitmately multiple small websites, each of which can be proven to be run by different people with no connection to each other, would mean it's exempt.

[–] DosDude@retrolemmy.com 2 points 7 months ago

Well, most are run by 1 person or a small team. None have profits. Some have donation pages, and that's it. So they are exempt by definition.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.de 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Just put the moderation business into a separate entity with no real revenue, which has no more than 49 regular employees and employ the rest as freelancers. Bam.

[–] frog@beehaw.org 2 points 7 months ago

That would probably work in the US, but I'm not so sure it'd work in the EU. Even the UK is capable of cracking down on "freelancers" who are obviously just regular employees with bosses trying to dodge regulation.