this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
84 points (88.2% liked)

Atheism

4049 readers
650 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Today I had a Bible verse on my Masto timeline. And I know I shouldn't care, but it made me so angry. Like the verse itself was nice and all, no doubt. But holy fuck. You can find so much bullshit in that book. Why don't you quote that? You can't just cherry pick the quotes you like best.

I can't also go around and just quote random passages from Mein Kampf because they sound nice without the context.

I hate that so much. I always need to refrain from dropping Leviticus 21:18-21 or Timothy 2:12 or some other bullshit in the replies.

Sorry for the rant. Just needed to let it out somewhere.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OddFed@feddit.de 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

How is that related to the comment you replied to? They weren't saying anything about tolerance.

[–] OddFed@feddit.de 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So, the original comment said it's equally wrong to cherry-pick the negatives. These negatives and positives almost exclusively revolve around tolerance. The Bible is racist, antisemitic, ableist, homophobe, transphobe, etc. All of these topics are "tolerance" related. On the other hand, you have bible verses that teach us to be tolerant. And these are the ones that theists mostly quote. That's precisely the pinnacle of the tolerance paradox. It's exactly the fallacy of the horseshoe theory.

Maybe this image explains it better: An infographic explaining the tolerance paradox.

If we pretend that the Bible is "good", because we tolerate the intolerant sections, we are not in a neutral position. We would rather have a power balance that pushes intolerance.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca -4 points 9 months ago

Are you seriously comparing religions to Nazism? Wtf. We "tolerate" uncomfortable BOOKS all the time, that's part of what makes literature nuanced and worth analyzing. Yes people cherry pick quotes from the Bible, like they do for... Everthing? Every book, every person, every event is quoted with the bias and intent for whoever is quoting it.