this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
21 points (73.3% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35104 readers
1436 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I find it mildly infuriating that some coworkers think entering a break room gives them license to play loud music over speakers, use obscene language (especially to and about other coworkers), and disrupt the fifteen minutes of peace and quiet some of us crave in the workplace.

I also can't stand the fact that smokers can take unlimited 'breaks' whenever they please just to come back stinking up an entire room with their smoke.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DreamySweet@vlemmy.net 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I do agree with OP on the thing about smokers though. You shouldn't get special privileges just because you're a drug addict.

[–] norapink@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe OP should just go out for smoke breaks and not actually smoke

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Lmao! Do you call tea and coffee drinkers “drug addicts” too?! Yup, smoke breaks should either be deducted from the allotted lunch break, or all employees should be allowed to step outside for 5 mins or whatever.

[–] DreamySweet@vlemmy.net 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It depends on how often they use their drug and how they act about it. If you can't function and treat people like shit because you haven't had your coffee/tea yet, you're a drug addict.

[–] joe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is an emotionally manipulative tactic, and not a great look. It's no different than calling copyright infringement "theft", abortion "murder", or someone who speeds a "criminal".

Note that you're not wrong. People that get cranky if they don't get enough caffeine are probably feeling some withdrawals from it, and caffeine is a drug, but calling those people "drug addicts" leverages the emotional connotation from it's more colloquial usage. If you can't support your stance without emotional manipulation, you don't have much of a stance, yeah?

[–] DreamySweet@vlemmy.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who am I manipulating? It's just my opinion.

[–] joe@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You attempted to manipulate anyone that reads your comments into agreeing with your opinion.

Don't play dumb. It's also not a good look.

[–] DreamySweet@vlemmy.net 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, I don't expect people to agree with me. I know my opinion is very unpopular. I don't care.

[–] FatLegTed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Not unpopular here matey!

[–] joe@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Then there's no reason to be emotionally manipulative. If you were being honest right now, there would have been no reason to use the term "because you're a drug addict" in your comment. The gist of the comment doesn't change when that phrase is removed. It's just not as emotionally manipulative.

Edit: fixed misquote

[–] DreamySweet@vlemmy.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My opinion is that they are drug addicts. My opinion is also that being a drug addict is not something that should grant someone special privileges. How is that "emotionally manipulative"? I am not manipulating anyone.

[–] joe@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I already explained this to you. Do you really need me to link to a comment further up this chain?

[–] DreamySweet@vlemmy.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I explained why your explanation was wrong. Do you really need me to link to a comment further up this chain?

[–] Thorndike@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can still work while drinking coffee or tea. Smokers get to go outside and smoke for 10-15 minutes while NOT working and get paid for that time.

[–] RomeCallen@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

go outside for a break then. who says youre not a smoker?

[–] nsmnc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] RomeCallen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what did i miss?

take a break when the smokers do. just go outside. who says you dont smoke?

[–] nsmnc@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The number of breaks allotted to those who smoke was not the point.

I moved into my own place to get away from habitual smokers, yet I'm forever doing laundry to get someone else's smoke out of my clothes.

[–] RomeCallen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

oh i thought cuz you were mad about their unlimited breaks that was a factor for you

sounds like the amount of breaks for them dont matter then, its just that they're stinky. which is fair. but you can get the breaks just the same if you wanted. maybe getting out for some fresh air would be good for you

[–] nsmnc@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm sorry but comparing coffee/tea to nicotine is like comparing OTC Tylenol to illegally obtained OxyContin.