Bridgy Fed made a splash earlier this week by announcing its latest progress in connecting the Fediverse to Bluesky and Nostr. Sadly, not everyone was welcoming.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rglullis@communick.news 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The whole idea in the first place was to NOT be corporate

The idea is that the network should not be owned and controlled by a corporation, not that no corporation should ever participate in it.

Besides, how "corporate" is a startup with a few dozen developers working on a fully open source project?

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago

Honestly I see the fediverse as a massive opportunity for corporations.

If you're Google, why not host a Google corporate instance where everything is authenticated as your own content, under your own URL, but you can still reshare outside content? You'll never have the issues of unwanted or controversial content appearing with your brand. There's no chance of a parody account pretending to be your customer service, and you won't have to pay a protection fee for an authentic checkmark.

This is 10x more important for governments to do, as right now I can't view official political discourse from my own government without giving my data to a private company.

[–] SineNomineAnonymous@lemmy.ml -4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We're talking about Meta and Dorsey's baby (yeah sure, he's not there anymore but we all know what kind of company he backs) and you're talking about startups?

[–] rglullis@communick.news 3 points 9 months ago

We’re talking about Meta

No, we talking about Bluesky.

Dorsey’s baby

He's moved on to Nostr. Also, Bluesky is open source and their work can be forked by anyone. You might disagree about whether it makes sense to work on another different protocol instead of trying to improve the ActivityPub ecosystem, but let's please not get into mud-slinging and this stupid tribal mentality.