World News

22058 readers

78 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Affirmative Action: Supreme Court Strikes Down Race-Based Admissions at Harvard and U.N.C. (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by dirtmayor@beehaw.org to c/news@beehaw.org

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archive Link from Ghost Archive

Original link from The New York Times

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] shanghaibebop@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

As someone who went to an "elite institution," coming from a first-generation immigrant background, and used it as a vehicle for massive social mobility, I am quite ambivalent (not in apathetic, but strong feelings about it on both sides) about the elimination of race-based admissions at these institutions.

The people who truly benefit from the current state of race-based affirmative action are not real "underprivileged people". 99.999% of those will never even reach the academic qualification needed to get past the first round of screening at these schools. The overwhelming number of people who "benefit" from this are under-represented minorities from extremely elite backgrounds - the black of latino kid who went to top-tier private schools. If you have two applicants: 1 White/Asian kid from a poor background, vs 1 black/latino kid from Philip Exeter, who do you think these schools will take?

These schools are institutions with the goal of perpetuating elitism. period. Legacy, athletes, "extracurriculars" are all just forms of gatekeeping for people without the knowledge, or social economic freedoms to partake in these activities. (I'm very confident about this from my years of helping underprivileged kids get into universities)

Now I do think race-based affirmative action does 2 things very well:

It broadens the racial and international perspectives of the new "wave" of elites, and there are numerous studies on how that improves the performance (mostly from a capitalistic point of view) of those students in the new international world.
It makes it so that there is some semblance of race diversity (at the cost of economic class diversity) within the new wave of "elites" coming out of these schools.

IMO, the path to more social equality isn't by changing the skin color of people who become elite, but by opening the gate for more people from non-traditional backgrounds in the form of community colleges and an easy path to transfer to universities (a la California university system, though the current pace of UCs is also aiming to join the ranks of these "elite" institutions)