this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
122 points (75.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

29827 readers
918 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 111 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Two things about that (overanalyzing your shower thought):

  1. Geneticists have what they call the "50/500 rule," which basically means that you need at least 50 people to avoid inbreeding, and at least 500 to avoid genetic drift. So while three people are 50% better than two, it's not going to come close to avoiding inbreeding.

  2. If you read up on Lilith, including your Wikipedia link, you'll see her name only comes up once in the Bible, and it's not as Adam's wife. All the stuff about her comes from other things, including Babylonian and Mesopotamian writings, and lots of folklore from the middle ages. And at that, she's sometimes Adam's first wife, with different explanations about what happened to her that really in her not coming back to the garden, or she's a demon. So there's not much likelihood that she's contributing to the gene pool.

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 75 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)
  1. Wasn't Eve made from Adam's rib and thus shares his DNA?
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 20 points 9 months ago (4 children)
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No, the products of incest.

Hemophilia and all that would be more likely, but no cool identical stuff going on

[–] eatham@aussie.zone 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)
[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

A blood disease where your blood doesn't clot basically.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's a disease where you don't stop bleeding when you bleed. The name comes from Latin words for blood and love, like, your body just loves bleeding

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Depends on the chromosomes, if adam had two identical ones for each the kids would be clones barring mutations.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The chances are around 260k to 1. Factoring Eve's lack of a second sex chromosome, (unless she has swyer syndrome) the equation would be 1/((22²+1)(23²))≈0.00039%

[–] Lojcs@lemm.ee -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Seeing how we're talking about religion and first man, I don't think we're limited by probability here.

BTW so there are 30k people with identical chromosomes??

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

As you mentioned it depends on chromosomal differences, I just provided the probability of it actually happening.

And, yes. Barring any mutations or trait selectivity, if we all came from the same individual, there would be about 30k identical people of the 8.1b population.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Lol, I read this as "would their kids be bones?"

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

Lol only their mom is bones

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Hmmm, no, because which of your genes you pass down is still a bit random.

[–] ebits21@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

That good ‘ol XX rib mmm

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/shorts/FN4pVp6lNJ0?si=0sGsDZMd1VYygGsJ

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That one version. There actually two different versions of Adam and Eve.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

One was they both created at same time and second version she created from one of his ribs.

[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Idk I thought it was an Evangelion thing

[–] towerful@programming.dev 32 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The only counterpoint i can see is that god is (honestly, at best WAS) infallible.
So god made 2 perfect humans who cannot inbreed as there are no defective genes.
At some point down the line, mutations came in and introduced possible genes that could combine/dominate to produce inbreeding.

If we are accepting the premise of 2 original humans, why not 2 perfect original humans.
If God made eve from adams rib, why not have them be genetically perfect.
But Im sure there is some science i am missing where a huge genome analysis has shown that "perfect" genes have never or could not ever exist.

And, tbh, this might as well be all science fiction based on a bunch of made up stories.

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If I remember my hermeneutics, the canon is that essentially, God had "blessed" early descendants of Adam and Eve, allowing their children to thrive.

It wasn't until after the flood I believe that incest becomes more of a theme in the Bible, implying that they shouldn't have children.

But it's been years since I gave this any serious study so I may be remembering incorrectly.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

It all makes more sense when you consider these stories in their historical social context. They're a compiled bundle of stories from various religious traditions that were kind of grafted together to form one monotheistic state religion to help unify the country. So you find stories from both north and south Judah for example, the two creation myths in Genesis. And you see the monotheistic god referred to by more than one moniker because they were originally different gods.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 13 points 9 months ago

Awesome, I was showing up for the demon angle.

[–] QueenB@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Good response!