this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
488 points (99.6% liked)

News

23296 readers
3925 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 81 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Big pharma doesn't need to do R&D because universities do it for them, then license the patents to big pharma..

https://fortune.com/2022/08/25/destroy-unique-relationship-america-universities-pharmaceutical-companies-drug-prices-research-bayh-dole-congress-howard-dean/

The same thing happens in Canada as well.

https://www.cigionline.org/articles/should-universities-get-out-patent-business/

edit -- I'm not justifying this ... just clarifying why it happens.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Some Republicans on the committee pushed back on Democratic criticism of pricing, arguing that pricing is what the market will bear. "In capitalism, if you're running an enterprise where you have a fiduciary responsibility to your owners, you try and get as high a price as you can," Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) said. "That's what you try and do. You try and make as much profit as you can. That's how free enterprise works. You think Chevrolet sits back and says, 'Gosh, how can we get the price of this Chevrolet down?' No, it's like, 'How high a price can I get and maximize the profit for my shareholder?'" He went on to describe price controls as "socialism lite".

Fuck anyone actually trying to live, I suppose. People dying due to not being able to afford healthcare is what the market has no trouble bearing. All to avoid a little "socialism".

(Whoops I meant to reply to the post, not specifically your comment).

[–] Kache@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Thank goodness for the Hippocratic origins of healthcare. Wish I could throw his words back at him so he could hear how insane it sounds in the context of healthcare. Just imagine:

You think a doctor sits back and says, 'Gosh, how can we get the price of saving this patient's life down?' No, it's like, 'How high a price can I get and maximize the profit for my shareholder?'"

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

Vulture capitalism, private equity and the like is the private sector with their priorities mixed up. For it to work properly, a company needs to have a charter and follow it ahead of a profit motive.

[–] comador@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

In San Diego, big pharma is now heavily investing into AI to do a lot of the chemical compound matching that was traditionally done by people like chemists and biotech employees too.

More money for the company, less paychecks to dispense.

edit links:

https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/02/15/1067904/ai-automation-drug-development/

https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/life-sciences/our-insights/generative-ai-in-the-pharmaceutical-industry-moving-from-hype-to-reality

[–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

All true, but where is the money for university research coming from?

I mean, some of those research grants come from the same private companies. There's value to them in using that money to train the next generation of scientists, in addition to funding basic research they can use directly.

But, admittedly I don't claim to know how the research dollars are split between private/government/other.

EDIT: Here is a study from UCLA covering 2010-2015 funding that shows about 75% of funding comes from government, and 25% from private industry, charities, or other non-government sources.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The money comes from us, the taxpayers (in Canada anyway), and the students' tuition fees.

Scientists have to be careful accepting money from companies as it could be a conflict of interest.

[–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I worked at a US university for 12 years, I can't speak to what happens in Canada, but here in the US it's definitely a mix. Student tuition is not used for research at all, at least not in any research program I've ever heard of.

In fact, research grants are garnished (usually to the tune of 30% or more) to pay general university expenses, and student instruction is part of that budget.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

Thanks for the info. I suspect the same thing happens with Canadian universities. Almost all levels of government help fund them and would probably deduct research grants and patent fees from funding.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Here in California the big research schools make a LOT of money by licensing to private industry. There are often a number of prominent law suits over research patents with the universities and private industry. The universities very much want to keep their patents and make money from them.

Looking at the news for CRISPR tells ya a lot about how modern research works and how universities make money.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Depends on the university., but schools with big flagship research departments like Stanford and the California UC systems make a shit load of money by licensing stuff to private industry. Which is why universities like UC Berkeley are fighting legal battles over CRISPR patents - licensing that stuff is going to make the UC system a fuck load of money.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I swear I read somewhere that even when companies were at their peak of investing money into research, more than 50% of it in the US was still coming from government funding.

[–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

That's almost certainly the case. Here's a breakdown of funding at UCLA that shows 25% of research funding coming from non-government sources. The rest is federal, state, or other government.