this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
480 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59467 readers
3985 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TurboTax maker Intuit spent millions in record lobbying blitz amid threats to tax prep industry::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] max@feddit.nl 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So your government could do what the commenter above suggested for 99% of the population. Got it.
Because that’s what they do in my country. Your income is pre-filled, and most people don’t need to do anything other than double check it and click submit. If you want to get tax breaks for edge cases like uncovered medical care, extra schooling, travel costs as a freelancer, etc., you just follow the mostly easy steps and fill that in.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I want the rich to be taxed; the system is broken bc it allows for loopholes. 100% should just get a bill.

[–] max@feddit.nl 5 points 9 months ago

One doesn’t have to exclude the other. I sense the irony in saying this, being Dutch (whose country is considered a tax haven for the rich and corporations unfortunately), but we don’t have to pay for tax software at least. Worst case, you’ll pay for a tax advisor/accounted if you have a really complicated situation with shit like alimony and wish to squeeze every last cent from it.

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Loopholes aren't bad, they're incentives for companies to do certain things rather than hard requirements for companies to do certain things.

It's when it's to such an extreme no or little tax is paid that there's a problem.

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

Loopholes also get a bad name because many of them are carved out to target specific people, companies, and demographics in ways that aren’t helpful to society at large.

[–] grayman@lemmy.world -5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Over 90% of tax revenue is collected from less than 10% of the population. Tax the rich is a campaign lie. It already happens. About 50% of adults pay net 0% or get out more than they put in.

The middle class is shrinking and the wage gap is getting worse partly because of the progressive tax system. Only the top 0.1% have the ability to not care about taxes. And even if you taxed them at 100%, they have the tools and money to avoid paying taxes on the vast majority of their wealth.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

Tax as a wealth transfer is exactly how to close the gap between rich and poor. You can see the picture but you have misunderstood how the elements relate. Not allowing the 0.1% to escape taxation is exactly what has to happen.